(SOLUTION) NR533 Week 1: Introduction: Self and Project

Week 1: Introduction: Self and Project

Because you have been in the program for a while now, you have had many opportunities to get to know others in the group fairly well. For this introduction, we’re going to shift gears a bit. During this course you will be relating many of your discussions and assignments to your project proposal you anticipate completing for your practicum. Please introduce yourself to the class and instructor and include the following information.

  1. Description of the type of facility by which you are employed.
  2. Your current position and for how long
  3. Your prior experience in financial management
  4. Share the PICO(T) you anticipate using for the final practicum project.
    * (For review of creating a PICOT see the example below or watch the media presentation located in resources and announcements)
  5. What led you to choose this issue/topic? With whom have you collaborated, or will you consult about the issue at your facility?
  6. What type of expenses/costs would you need to consider in helping you develop a preliminary budget for your project?
PICOT Writing Review

Situation:

Sunnybrook Health System has started the process for acquiring Magnet status. They have scheduled multiple planning and process meetings over the next year that require attendance of all staff. Staff must attend at least 70% of the meetings live. After three meetings, live attendance of night shift staff has been about 5%. There is concern that with the small amount of interest shown from this group, the benchmark of 70% for live attendance may be jeopardized. Currently, the meeting schedule is communicated to all staff via email and posted announcements. Suzie thinks an incentive of a free meal for live attendance might improve attendance of the night shift crew.

How could a PICOT be developed with this information?

P = Population – Describes the group upon which the intervention will have an effect.

   Ex: night shift staff

I = Intervention – What we want to do that is different from what we currently do; the thing that is going
to impact the population identified

   Ex. coupons for a free meal in the cafeteria

C = Comparison – Here the comparison is a before and after the intervention (incentive in this case)

   Ex: communication of scheduled meetings via email and posted announcements

O = Outcome – What we want to see happen as a result of the intervention. The outcome should meet three criteria: direction (increase, decrease, etc), a baseline, and a goal.

   Ex: increased mandatory meeting live attendance from 5% to 50%

T = Timing or Timeframe – When we expect to see the outcomes.

   Ex: over the next 4 meetings

Now you can create the PICOT:

Among night shift staff(P), will offering a coupon for a free meal in the cafeteria(I), as opposed to only email invitations and posted announcements(C), increase mandatory meeting live attendance from 5% to 50% (O) over the next 4 meetings(T)?

SOLUTION

As a form of research, the following PICOT question can be asked: in patients that are identified as high risk for developing a pressure ulcer (P), does the implementation of a pressure ulcer protocol initiated in the emergency department (I) as compared to patients who receive usual care (C), reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (O) on day 3 of hospitalization (T)?

Decreasing hospital acquired strain ulcers (PUs) in intensive care units (ICUs) has emerged as a crucial quality metric for overall health methods internationally. Work that is limited was inflicted on characterize the profile of PUs in the ICU utilizing observational details from the electronic health record (EHR) (Palomares, & Rao, 2018). Consequently, you will find restricted EHR based prognostic resources for deciding a patient ‘s chance of PU development, with majority of institutions depending on nurse calculated threat scores such as for instance the Braden score to determine high risk people. PUs are, nonetheless, treatable and preventable eminently in the early stages of theirs. So, the decrease of PUs in acute care continues to be displaying the National Quality Forum (The Agency and nqf) for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) as a crucial quality metric, and both companies have printed frameworks for dealing with the issue (Palomares, & Rao, 2018).Please click the purchase button to access the entire copy at $5